1 Rated Books 10 Rated Books Halloween Week

Halloween Week – It: The Book Smugglers’ Interview Review

Thea: So, now you’ve read one of my Desert Island Keepers! What was your first impression of the novel?



I started reading it with not a small amount of trepidation. Not only this was my first full length Stephen King novel (not counting The Gunslinger which is so short – I loved it by the way) but hailed as one of the scariest books in the known universe.

But to my surprise, the opening chapter was scary yes, but it was so touching with the relationship between Bill and his younger brother Georgie, who dies right there and then, setting things in motion. I was expecting pure, unabashed horror and all I got was heart. Pure and simple heart. I was hooked as I felt my emotions leaping into the book and connecting with the kids’.

From there on, my amazement only progressed and grew tenfold as we get a glimpse into the adult life of the characters and once again, I was surprised that the writing was so good and in a few pages, Stephen King showed me who these people were.

THEN, the horror starts as each of them starts remembering their forgotten childhood, and there was this sense of mystery about the why or how but also this beautiful flowing back and forth between now and then until all comes into place. It is a tour the force, an ambitious project that pans out until about ¾ of the novel when it all comes crumbling down like a sand castle washed by sea waves.

Thea: Which of the “Losers Club” was your favorite and why?


Easy peasy: Ben. You know how much I love romance – so this bias of mine probably account for Ben being my favorite because out of all the kids he was the knight in shinning armour – the one that was always protecting and thinking about Bev. The way he loved her, how he felt about her, it was so sweet and tender. Plus there is the fact that he was so smart and the library was his favorite place. And my heart was swelling with tenderness as this fat, bullied, lonely kid finds solace in the friendship with the others.

I don’t get the overstated special allure of Bill – I mean he was as cool as the other kids but the story and memory I wanted to read the most was always Ben’s.

My second favorite was loud-mouthed Ritchie!

Thea: What was the scariest part of the novel for you (if any parts at all)?


The scariest part? It was not all the times “It” showed up. Oh no. Although that was pretty scary, with the clown, the ghosts, the voices * shudder *. ( I haven’t been able to sleep for over a week now)

No, the scariest part of the novel was actually all the showdowns between Bev and her father and between the kids and Henry Bowers. Because these people were so bad and so cruel and mentally unbalanced but also so very real and within the realm of possibility – the abuse and the bullying can happen anywhere, any time, in REAL life and that is such a horrendous thought- that they scared the shit out of me. I felt Henry Bowers could kill and hurt any of them more even than It. But if was even worse because Henry himself was bullied by his own father in a vicious circle that is, unfortunately, so believable.

Thea: What things did you love the most about this book? What did you hate the most?


What I loved the most – Of course, the friendship between the kids – it is the heart and soul of the novel. The moments where they are still so innocent playing together or talking, or just making fun of each other. Each scene when they were together was great – and I burst into laughter as much as they did in the book. I connected with them in such a way, I was terrified at the ugly, scary things that kept happening to all of them. I wanted to protect them, to nurse them, to play with them. I was in pins and needles worrying that any of them would die and it was terrible, terrible to feel so.

What I hated the most – The ending. More on that below.

Also I thought some of the interludes were boring and pointless – in fact, I thought the novel was unnecessarily long.

Thea: What do you think is the strongest theme of the novel? What affected you the most?


I would say that the strongest theme of the novel is the bond of friendship and the horrors of real life – more so than the loss of innocence, although that is very present as well. But without the friendship they shared nothing would have been possible.

What affected me the most -would you believe if I said it was the relationship between some of the kids and their parents? Like Eddie when he realises that his mother has been giving him placebo medicine to control him? Or how Bill’s parents shut him off after Georgie’s death? Or the worst of all, Bev and her parents? That was terrifying beyond comprehension.

They were alone dude, alone, they could not rely on anyone except themselves and so we are back to the theme of friendship. And how towards the end, Stephen managed to DESTROY every wonderful he created to that point with a turn of events that was stupid beyond belief.

SPOILERS FOLLOW HERE–Ana talks about the ending and why she was so disturbed by the novel.

Thea: So, let’s talk about the ending. You hated it–what exactly turned you off to the book?


It started somewhere around the 1000th page – up to that point, I had the clear impression that I was reading one of the best books of my life.

Then, they went into the smoke tent to have the vision and lo an behold, Ritchie and Mike have the vision of what It was – and how It had come…..from outer space or from the macro-universe or whatever as we learn later on. That was the first signal of alert. I rolled my eyes and I was sad that this was the explanation for It – (I had created this theory in mind that It was actually a creation of Derry’s rotten citizens) . But later on it gets worse – because It happens to be a primordial being that exists since the dawn of time and there is a turtle and the turtle is older than It. And we get a glimpse into Its mind and It was SCARED. Of a bunch of kids. The thing that has been terrorising Derry for such a long time and is hands down of the scariest shits I have ever read about, is scared. That killed any terror I have felt up to that point. Talk about absurd.

But that was not the worse, oh no. That first sign of alert was not enough to put be me off.

I trotted on and then GODDAMN IT Bill and Bev have sex. I started to cry, because it felt so so soooo wrong, I wanted Bev and Ben to be together, to have a real adult conversation, to learn about each other , etc. Ok, so this is my romantic self speaking so I still could have lived with it. But in the middle of the sex scene, Bev remembers something else from their first showdown with It when they were kids – that she, as a way of saving them all, decided that: SHE HAD TO HAVE SEX WITH ALL OF THEM.

It was like a jolt of pure electricity. I was like, “I did not just read this”. I read it again, then again, then again. Then I emailed you and asked if what I read was true. But it wasn’t enough, I broke my rule of not looking for spoilers and went to wikipedia and yes, it was true. I was stupefied, shocked, mystified. NO WAY.

The book died for me there and then. I didn’t even need to read the rest because everything I felt for the kids, all of a sudden, is all gone. I didn’t care anymore, I felt like quitting altogether. But I kept on, skipping huge chunks, feeling bereft once more when I read about the freaking spider and then, and then the absurd sex scene.

Thea: Despite the obvious tastelessness of adolescent sex, I felt that it served a place in the story, not only as Beverly’s way of saving her friends, but as more symbolic of their complete loss of innocence and the end of childhood. Is there a point of no return? Did this scene mean an automatic deal-breaker for you?


Absolutely, yes. I don’t even know where to start.

First there is the obvious absurdity of the scene itself. So, they are on the run, lost in the underground passages , they are losing the bond with each other (why? Why were they losing the bond with each other AFTER all they have been through?) , then Bev decided the way to brind them together is to have sex with all of them.

Can I reiterate the fact that we are talking about 11 year old children? That is absolutely inappropriate and it irked me out entirely.

Then what REALLY bugs me the most is the very idea that only sex will bind people – not love, not care, not friendship, but sex. But if you have sex with someone, it stops being simple friendship and turns into something else – friendship can still be a part of it, of course.

But the premise is ridiculous and preposterous and sexist. One girl – six boys, all around 11 years old. Come one Stephen King are you freaking kidding me? I am not one to play around with “what ifs” but can we play around with the idea here?

This principle should hold in any scenario – now you tell me if there were six girls and one boy would he have to have sex with all of them? What if two of them were brother and sister? What if there was more than one girl in the group – would the boys have to have sex with both of them? Would the two girls have sex with each other? Furthermore, by having sex with Bev they are all connected to HER, but they are not connected to each other. They should have had sex with each other as well. But no, it is the girl who makes the great sacrifice.

AND, and you can’t tell me that this is not ridiculous – she hardly feels any pain, even though she is an 11 year old virgin, who up to that point didn’t even know that the penis would go into the vagina, even though there are no preliminaries, no lubrication, and Thea, she comes. SHE COMES, TWICE. After having been beaten up, almost raped by her own father, after facing the primordial evil being, after having sex with 4, she orgasms when she has sex with the last 2 boys – I can’t believe this. I am sorry, I just don’t.

The sense of absurdity is so great I can’t even begin to describe my despair. It hurts even more because for 1000 pages I was completely fascinated with this story.

But this ending was a stupid, pathetic, irrelevant, contrived way out and all the sense of wonderment I had with this novel went up like smoke in the air.

Thea: It confronts you and takes on the form of your greatest fear–what is it?


You. Coming after me after you read the above.

Thea: How do you rate it?


Up to page 1000 I would have easily rated it a 9 missing on a 10 because of the unnecessary length of the novel and some pretty boring passages. After the breaking point – the sex between Bill and Bev – it is a 1. My completely visceral reaction to that one scene of gang bang may seem completely blown out of proportion but this is really, in all honestly, how I feel. Couple that with the fact that the the last third of the book never lives up to the high, impossible expectations created by the first AMAZING 2/3 and there you have it: a 1. Our first ever. It hurts to say so, as I did really really loved most part of it but I felt betrayed in the end, so I want the hours I spent reading this book, back.

I wonder how other people feel about this. Am I the crazy one here?

**THEA’S NOTE: SINCE it is Halloween Week and Thea has assumed control of the blog, she is totally rebutting Ana’s way-harsh comments.**

REBUTTAL: I really can’t let this go undefended (certainly not on ‘my’ week, either!) *straps on Commando vest and puts on war paint*

Ok, I get that the sex part will ick out some readers. Especially readers of the romance persuasion such as dear Ana. BUT, if you have read this far into the novel (we’re talking around pg 1000 here), you will know that Bev’s character is in large part defined by her shitty life at home. Her father beats her, abuses her almost to the point of sexual abuse–he constantly accuses Bevvy of being a bad girl, fooling around/sleeping with ‘those boys’–when nothing could be farther from the truth. How many times do we see this in her little flashbacks? I think then it kind of makes sense that this is her way of saving her friends, in addition to being that very strong–and yes saddening–way of ending her childhood. *Note: As to the whole not hurting and orgasm thing, I don’t know what to say(this is getting to be a weird conversation!)–they are all eleven years old, so theoretically they all wouldn’t be very…big. And she does hurt. Moving on!*

I’m not a fan of the sex, but I don’t see it as being a deal-breaker for the novel. It was important to the story in that it saved them and allowed them to find their way together (as to Ana’s claim that the loss of their bond after everything they had been through together is silly, I say that clearly they hadn’t fully defeated it, and the evil wasn’t over–since they had to return 30 years later!). And I disagree about the sex being meaningless–going past the grossness that these are 11 year olds (that have seen more disgusting things in their lives and have battled an ancient evil), their bond was always based on their love and friendship. It’s not as though Bev just pulled her pants down and said let’s have at it ‘cuz I’m horny! They close their pact with sex and then with a blood oath, to promise to return to fight It should It ever come back.

Regardless, even if the sex part is wrong and gross–is it enough to derail your entire reading experience with the novel? It’s a teeny tiny part of the story that can be skipped or skimmed over. And it’s not even the end of the book, as Ana’s reaction would suggest!!!!

If you keep reading past the ONE SCENE, the book ends on hope. It’s a book about sacrifice as well–not just Beverly, but more importantly with Eddie using his inhaler to stop It once again and dying in the process, with Mike in the hospital near death after stopping Henry Bowers, with Bill finally finishing the ritual of Chud for the second time.

And the final ending!!!!! With Bill riding his bike again, helping Audra, to outride and beat the devil one last time…these all are factors to me that outweigh any misgivings about that one, tiny scene.

And dude, a ONE?!?! Really!??! A ONE!??!! I’ve never even given a book that ultimate low rating. Wow.

So far as to what IT is and where it comes from, the importance of the Turtle, etc–all I can say is, if you read the Dark Tower books, this all makes a whole lot more sense. And again, in my opinion the important thing isn’t where It came from, but the fact that it is there, in the town, fed by fear and awakened by the depravity and horror that resides in people.

So there you have it. Opposite ends of the spectrum. Ana gives It the lowest grade ever given on this blog, while Thea hands out one of her extremely rare 10s. If you’ve read the book, or want to comment, we’d love to hear from you. Where do you stand?


  • kmont
    October 31, 2008 at 12:26 pm

    Whoa and WOW. I feel like I’m standing between you both, looking and can’t decide which one to go stand beside. I’ll just stick to the middle for now lol.

    Hmmm, errr, weeelllll….eleven year old sex, the sound of it, squicks me out. I totally see what you mean Thea, how Bev’s childhood could shape this idea in her mind, but…..it still squicks me out. Maybe this is the mom in me talking; the mere thought of my own child initiating sex at eleven makes me want to throw up. Yet, I suppose I would have to read it to form an opinion.

    I dunno, I might still give this book a go one day should I pick up horror again, but I’m glad to have read your reservations on it, Ana.

    Thanks to both of you for a very insightful look into the book!

  • Katiebabs a.k.a KB
    October 31, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    I agree with Ana, the sex was so not needed. Especially in a cave with a first floor. Um no.

  • meljean brook
    October 31, 2008 at 1:27 pm

    I can see why it might be a deal-breaker … but I do lean toward Thea’s reading of it. In a way, I know the sex is physical, but because they are 11, and because the idea of it is absurd on so many levels (the situation they are in when it happens) I really read it as more of an emotional bond, and Bev taking control of something that she absolutely doesn’t have control of at any other time: her sexuality.

    I love Ben, and GRRR at the Bill/Bev thing, but the whole-gang sex scene does work for me. (And it might be that because it does squick me out when I think of it in literal terms I’m forcing it into a symbolic thing … but that’s how I read a lot of stuff anyway, lol.)

  • meljean brook
    October 31, 2008 at 1:29 pm

    Of course, it might also be because I was about the same age when I first read IT, so my first reading and interpretation of the scene (which didn’t focus on the physical aspects of it) has stuck with me more than the adult in me being squicked.

  • Carolyn Jean
    October 31, 2008 at 1:41 pm

    Wow. I didn’t know you guys were doing this. What a cool challenge! Well, I never read IT, so I have nothing to chime in with, but I love that you had such radically different interpretations.

  • meljean brook
    October 31, 2008 at 1:42 pm

    Ah! (because I can’t quite leave the topic now that I’m thinking about it)

    SPOILERS (kind of)

    I just remembered the part that actually bothered me more than the sex — it’s when they are grown up, holding hands when they are facing IT the last time, and there’s this power flowing through them all. They all react, but Beverly’s reaction is for her hips to jerk like in “orgasm”.

    THAT actually bothered me because she was still being described/defined with sex, even at that point. Even when I was a kid that stuck out to me.

  • Thea
    October 31, 2008 at 1:46 pm

    Of course, it might also be because I was about the same age when I first read IT, so my first reading and interpretation of the scene (which didn’t focus on the physical aspects of it) has stuck with me more than the adult in me being squicked.

    That’s a really good point–and probably has influence me as well. I was about 13 when I first read the book, and it didn’t affect me as much. I suppose had I read this as an adult first, I may have had a different reaction (although I don’t think it would change my overall interpretation of the book).

  • Ana
    October 31, 2008 at 1:55 pm

    “They all react, but Beverly’s reaction is for her hips to jerk like in “orgasm”. “

    That bothered me as well, Meljean. I thought Bev was the most sexualised defined of the characters – why didn’t the men have the same sort of reaction, for example?

    Gaah. I don’t know there are these hot topics that can make or break a book for me – even if all the rest is amazing, I still won’t be able to say in the end: “wow what a good book that was”. Children gang bang sex is apparantely one of them. Rape by a hero in a romance novel is another.

  • Thea
    October 31, 2008 at 1:56 pm

    LOL! Meljean!!!! I know exactly which part you are talking about!

    I will agree with that, definitely–and to be honest, it’s something that has characterized a lot of King’s earlier work. Well, characterizes most horror, to be perfectly honest. Women are objectified and ‘sexualized’ or completely virginized (I’m just finishing up my Slasher movie list, which follows that strict set of rules for the damsels in distress, especially).

    Someone out there needs to write the definitive female horror novel 😉

  • Thea
    October 31, 2008 at 2:01 pm

    Ana–well, to play the other side *devil* Bev’s character was very rooted in sexuality, from her beginnings as a child and throughout the rest of her life. The others simply weren’t. Bill had his writing, Ben had his love for Bev and his weight, Richie had his big mouth, Stan his unfailing sense of logic, Mike his passion for research, and Eddie his mommy issues and hypochondria.

    Know what I mean?

    I agree that it seems unfair that women in general are relegated to the sexualized role, but I don’t think it would fit with any of the other characters here. Besides possibly Henry Bowers. But that’s a whole different can o’ worms.

  • meljean brook
    October 31, 2008 at 2:06 pm

    Am I going to hell if I admit the phrase “children gang bang” just cracked me up?

  • Karen Mahoney
    November 1, 2008 at 1:13 pm

    Meljean, if you’re going to hell then I’m going with you. You just made me snort my tea… *g*

  • Karen Mahoney
    November 1, 2008 at 1:16 pm

    And on a more serious note, I CAN see Ana’s reading of this now that I’m an adult. BUT… I have only read the book once, many many years ago, and I think back then it just didn’t bother me so much.

    Overall, I still remember IT as one of the best King books I’ve read. Not my favourite (that’s THE STAND), but pretty damn good.

    This has been really interesting, though… Reading the review/interview here, both girls’ thoughts – and then all the comments. I think I’m with Meljean, in that the age I was when I first read it definitely had an effect on me and the ‘youthful sex’ didn’t have the same effect on me that it might do now.

    I wonder… I might have to re-read it! 🙂

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.