5 Rated Books Book Reviews

Book Review: The Angel’s Game by Carlos Ruiz Zafon

Title: The Angel’s Game

Author: Carlos Ruiz Zafon

Genre: Literary Fiction (Mystery)

UK cover
US cover

Publisher:Weidenfeld & Nicolson (UK) / Doubleday (US)
Publishing Date: 28 May 2009/ June 16 2009
Hardcover: 448 pages/ 544 pages

Stand Alone/ Series: Can be read as a stand alone but has connections with another book by the author: The Shadow of the Wind

Summary:In an abandoned mansion at the heart of Barcelona, a young man, David Martín, makes his living by writing sensationalist novels under a pseudonym. The survivor of a troubled childhood, he has taken refuge in the world of books, and spends his nights spinning baroque tales about the city’s underworld. But perhaps his dark imaginings are not as strange as they seem, for in a locked room deep within the house lie photographs and letters hinting at the mysterious death of the previous owner.

Like a slow poison, the history of the place seeps into his bones as he struggles with an impossible love. Close to despair, David receives a letter from a reclusive French editor, Andreas Corelli, who makes him the offer of a lifetime. He is to write a book unlike anything that has existed – a book with the power to change hearts and minds. In return, he will receive a fortune, perhaps more. But as David begins the work, he realises that there is a connection between this haunting book and the shadows that surround his home.

Why did I read the book:
The Shadow of the Wind by this same author is simply one of my top 5 favorite books of all time. So yeah. I HAD to read this one which is described as a prequel (of sorts).

Review:

The Shadow of the Wind by Carlos Ruiz Zafon is one of my top 5 favourite books of all time. The book was an immense success worldwide and it was no surprise when I heard that the author was going to go back to the same world and write a prequel. I was overwhelmed with jubilation and…..fear. Could another book set in the same world live up to the Great Expectations that would inevitably be attached to it?

The Angel’s Game was released with grand fanfare in Spain and in a matter of days, became the most successful book to ever be published over there. The English translation has just been released here in the UK and in the US and the reviews so far have been extremely positive.

I finally picked up to read it last weekend and was done in a matter of hours. The start of the novel, the first few chapters were everything I could have hoped for: the beautiful, evocative writing (a tremendous translation work by Julia Graves) was there as was that atmospheric feel and gothic quality with a mystery in the works.

The protagonist David Martin, narrates his own story. From his childhood spent in poverty, with a father who was an alcoholic and an absent mother who left them both. The description of the earlier years is brief and yet, effective: the impression of a complicated relationship with the father, the lasting feeling of rejection caused by the mother and the passion for books and reading are all stepping stones to David’s psyche . The hero’s childhood has a Dickensian quality to it, a fact that is not lost to him: Great Expectations is his favorite book and to be a writer like Mr Dickens becomes David’s aspiration.

After the tragic death of his father, David is left all alone in the world until he is sort of adopted by the local newspaper. His mentor and friend, the rich Pedro Vidal is a writer himself and helps David to become a writer of penny dreadful stories. His immediate commercial success does not endear him to his colleagues and David is basically a loner. Then, he gets fired and is hired by another publisher to write gothic novels. His writing becomes his life and he is consumed by it: living to write, not writing to live. He rents an old abandoned tower house and the times go by.

All through this, his success is followed by a mysterious Paris’ publisher, Andreas Corelli who eventually, when David reaches a crossroad from which there is no return, tempts him with an offer he can’t refuse. A Faustian pact in which David has one year to write a book for Andreas. A book that will create a new religion. (yeah. seriously).

But soon enough, his entanglement with the mysterious publisher, the mystery that surrounds his own house and its previous mad owner plus his doomed love affair with a woman named Christina may prove too much for David.

It certainly proved to be too much for the book and the second part of The Angel’s Game ends up being a total and complete mess that never lives up to the excellent build-up of the first few chapters. I mentioned that initially, the writing and the plotting were really good, but even then the characterisations were a letdown. I kept hoping that there would be a moment when a balance between all elements (writing, plot, characterisation) would be achieved but it never happens.

David is not a sympathetic character. He is, for most of the book, oddly detached and there is the recurring thought that David is a spectator of his own life. From the benefactors that help him to survive and who guide and help him to offers he can’t refuse, it seems that David is never an active character of his own story. Weird, strange things happen to him all the time, and he hardly even blinks, never investigates nor does he actively seeks an answer until very late in the book.

He is also a very inconsistent character as at times he is consumed with obsessions and has a dark, brooding, stance and then the next minute he is engaging in witty banter with his assistant, Isabela.

There is a lack of feeling when it comes to David. I believe the readers are supposed to think that David LOVES reading and writing and yet…..he never is shown doing any reading and the writing he does is oddly devoid of passion. It is more like a compulsion. We are told over and over that he loves Christina (a wallpaper character if ever there was one) but the feeling never leaps from the page and quite frankly, I never understood why he loved her or as for that matter, why she loved him back.

Until that is, I found out that there was indeed a game being played – by Zafon and that the joke was on ME. That there may be a reason behind the lack of reaction from David. But when these suspicions appeared that David is not all that of a reliable narrator, it was too late and I didn’t care enough to be bothered. It was too little too late. Add that to the mess of the second half, with the growing mystery and madness and the open-for-interpretation clumsy ending with many of the mysteries of the book never addressed again, I ended up with the feeling that I was reading a beautiful yet empty package.

But it makes me wonder. It makes me think that maybe, just maybe these Great Expectations are a hard and ugly thing to live up to. I can’t help but to think that The Angel’s Game is not the book that Zafon wanted to write. I wonder if these opening words that David utters are coming directly from Zafon’s soul:

“A writer never forgets the first time he accepted a few coins or a word of praise in exchange for a story. He will never forget the sweet poison of vanity in his blood, and the belief that, if he succeeds in not letting anyone discover his lack of talent, the dream of literature will provide him with a roof over his head, a hot meal at the end of the day, and what he covets the most: his name printed on a miserable piece of paper that surely will outlive him. A writer is condemned to remember that moment, because from then on he is doomed and his soul has a price”

Maybe I am going too far when I compare the author with his own character. But given that both Zafon’s own passion for Barcelona and his passion for books are acknowledged aspects of his stories why not this as well? The fact that publishers in the book are described as almost devil-like creatures, ever present and looming over David like harpies, how much of the author is in these pages and how much of this story is his way of exorcising the pressure for a second hit?

This is even clearer to me, by the fact the story seems to be set at a time that would provide connections to Shadow of the Wind and yet it could have been set at any other time. The (loose) connection with the previous book comes from having David visiting the Cemetery of Forgotten Books and being friends with old Sempere of Sempere and Son, the bookshop that is central to that one story.

Did the book crumble under the weight of my own Great Expectations? Maybe. But The Angel’s Game to me, pales in comparison to The Shadow of the Wind simply because it lacks Larger than Life characters to deeply care for and villains to completely abhor. The beautiful writing does not save the emptiness left by the poor characterisations and the confusing plot.

Simple as that. 4 days after reading it and it is already forgotten.

Notable Quotes/ Parts:

An example of the beautiful writing. Vidal on love and other things:

(…) you may not fall in love, you may not be able to or you may not wish to give your whole life to anyone and, like me, you may turn forty-five one day and realise that you’re no longer young and you have never found a choir of cupids with lyres, or a bed of white roses leading towards the altar. The only revenge left for you then will be to steal from life the pleasure of firm and passionate flesh – a pleasure that evaporates faster than good intentions and is the nearest thing to heaven you will find in this stinking world, where everything decays, beginning with beauty and ending with memory.

Verdict: The first half is almost everything I hoped for: amazing writing and atmosphere and a gripping mystery even if the characters are wallpapery. Unfortunately, the second half is a wreck. In one word: disappointing.

Rating: 5 . Meh

Reading Next: Warbreaker by Brandon Sanderson

15 Comments

  • Bridget Locke
    July 9, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    Wow, what a bummer. I think the way you expressed your frustrations & doubts really express how a lot of readers feel when it comes to our favorite authors or books.

    I know I’ve suffered that disappointment quite a few times in my life when I’ve read a book that was amazing and all of the others ended up falling by the wayside. I think the hardest thing for me is reading a first book by an author that is stunning and then getting dumped w/ crap after that. *sigh*

    I hope, when I get published, that I will be able to keep all of my books consistently great! 😀

  • KMont
    July 9, 2009 at 1:54 pm

    It’s such a bummer when he books we anticipate the most don’t live up to that anticipation and expectations. Sorry that happened.

  • orannia
    July 9, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    (((Ana)))

    To have such anticipation (from the first book) and for the second to start so well and then fall…you must be feeling rather flat. I’m sorry 🙁 Here’s hoping that the next book you pick up will be a doozy 🙂

  • Marg
    July 14, 2009 at 4:00 am

    Shadow of the Wind is one of my favourite books of all times. I rushed out to buy this one, but now I am not sure that I am ready to read it, just in case I am disappointed with it and it kind of tarnishes my memories of Shadow

  • edifanob
    July 14, 2009 at 10:36 am

    I also loved The shadow of the Wind and of course my expectations are high.
    This is the second review – and it is a good one – I read. And it is the second time that I read about disappointment.
    Therefore I lowered my expectations. I will buy and read The Angel’s Game in August. Or shall I abandon? No, I want to read it anyway….

  • Hollyberry
    July 24, 2009 at 3:34 am

    I couldn’t agree more with the above review. You expressed the dissappointment exactly as I felt it, I too had Great Expectations and they simply were not met but not because my expectations were too great but that simply David was not a character like Daniel. He was so detached that it was almost impossible to sympathise with him, in Shadow, books and writing give the characters life it is their very reason for being but one cannot be left with the understanding of David, that writting is a curse for him. Maybe that’s the point however. Also so many plot twists and mysteries were left un accounted for, the thing I liked about Shadow was that it brought everything together, maybe that was too unrealistic but then it is a fictional story and I enjoyed the manner in which it resolved itself. I finished The Angel’s Game after unfortunately forcing myself to read it believeing that it would get better that I would and could fall in love with city and the characters the way i had done in Shadow, however I was sorely dissappointed. Better luck next time Zafon!

  • Brewster
    February 4, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    Here I find myself, having just finished Angel’s game, hoping to find out what it was all about………only to find ❓

  • leo
    April 15, 2010 at 7:12 am

    this was my first Zafón book and i loved it…
    as for ur disappointments i guess bias robs us of pleasure.

  • mg
    May 26, 2010 at 2:06 pm

    I had no expectations about The Angel’s Game as I had not read Shadow of the Wind, but a friend who loved Shadow had started reading Angel with the proverbial Great Expectations so I picked up a free copy with other purchases. So in my case, it was not “bias robbing us of pleasure” as one reviewer has said. The characters were utterly one dimensional and there was little in the writing to make me care about what happened to most of them, including the narrator. There were loads of loose threads and unanswered questions at the end and although I stuck with it to the end, it was out of simple curiosity, not enjoyment. Glad it was a freebie. Now I need to read Shadow of the Wind as an antidote as many people seem to love that book.

  • Saffron
    March 11, 2012 at 10:55 am

    I read The Angel Game before Shadow of the Wind and I have to say, I couldn’t put it down. I loved, loved, loved it from start to finish. For the first time ever, I was cross when the train arrived on time, as it meant less time to read my book, cross when I got to work, as it meant less time to read my book and really cheesed off when I couldn’t stay awake any longer, as it meant…. I even preferred it to Shadow of the Wind, so clearly I am in a minority of 1! Ah to be a chip off the old block…

  • Book Review: The Prisoner of Heaven by Carlos Ruiz Zafón | The Book Smugglers
    July 23, 2012 at 2:51 am

    […] is simply one of my favourite books of all time. Although I loathed the second book in the series The Angel’s Game as well as The Midnight Palace a book in a different series, I wanted to give his books one last […]

  • Frk. Nielsen » Englens spil
    December 30, 2012 at 3:25 am

    […] læser forklarer her, hvorfor han blev skuffet over at læse Englens spil, og kommer med den interessante tolkning, at David faktisk er Zufón selv, og at bogen Store […]

  • Allan
    April 5, 2013 at 4:14 am

    Hi, Thanks for taking the time to put your thoughts on paper (or screen). I read through your review and the responses and whilst I respect your opinion, you should probably take a little care to not spoil the potential joy that others might get from the book. Yes, I agree it gets hard to follow the sometimes bi-polar like behaviour and unusual relationships David has with women in the second half of the book and I must say I am not quite sure I fully understand all the relationships e.g. The Boss to Marlasca and why Marlasca decided to steal the identity of the Police Officer etc. etc. However I really felt for David and his struggles with his passion (or compulsion) to write. It is probably the only thing that kept him alive and gave him a purpose. I thought his reserved and unusual social skills and behaviour probably describe accurately how a boy who grew up rejected by his mother and tortured by knowing where she was and not being able to feel the love that a son deserves of a mother. (This might explain his lack of emotion and inability to really love a woman as he had no role model) Add his war tormented father who is illiterate and unfortunately incapable of being a role model to a child, package the other horrific events in a time where class was everything in a country that is spectacularly animated by the author. In my humble opinion Carlos has produced a high quality piece of literature that if you allow yourself, you can feel the pain and discomfort of an unfortunate child living somewhere between praying for death and clinging to life. I say anything that you can read that challenges your heart, your mind, your ethics and your soul by seeing things through others eyes is well worth investing in.
    Enjoy!!

  • Tristan
    May 8, 2014 at 4:22 pm

    I believe you have misjudged The Angel’s Game. The Angel’s Game ending, which you describe as disappointing, actually leaves so much to iterpretation, in my opinion this is great, and possibly set up to all come together in the last novel.
    In your so called review you do not explain the open ending. Is Corelli the fallen angel, who as a kid wanted to be god, and was punished and sent away by his father? Is Corelli now trying to start a new religion with a book able to compete with the bible? Or is David just insane? I believe the beauty of this book is in the challenging ending, in looking back for hints of corelli’s real identity. You’ll recall:
    1- Corelli telling David that they’re similar, because David lost his father, and he was repudiated by his father (for reasons he doesn’t want to share with David)
    2- a dialogue between David and Corelli, when the latter tells David that they shall meet again, to which David replies if they’re going to meet at the same place, and Corelli says ‘god will tell’ cheesing as if he understood the sarcasm beneath that.
    3- when Corelli is asked by David about the angels brooch that he wears, he says from my family (angels that lived with him with god in heaven)

    So, this book shall not be looked at as another Shadow of the Wind, but as a more mature book, which invites the reader to challenge him/herself. Personally I loved this book, especially because of the mystery surrounding Andreas Corelli.
    PS: the answer is in the title. Corelli being an angel playing a game (with David and his beloved ones)

  • Alessandro 'Lex' ? (JLUPodcast) (@raveryn)
    June 7, 2021 at 12:09 pm

    “David is not a sympathetic character. He is, for most of the book, oddly detached and there is the recurring thought that David is a spectator of his own life.”……uh…….that’s the whole point. You can walk away reading this as a supernatural affair, or you can walk away reading it as a more grounded story. The latter basically requires the detachment to work, because in that interpretation he is very much a spectator of his own life.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.