4 Rated Books Book Reviews DNF Books

Joint Review: Shatter Me by Tahereh Mafi

Title: Shatter Me

Author: Tahereh Mafi

Genre: Science Fiction, Dystopia, PNR, Young Adult

Publisher: Harper Teen
Publication Date: October 15 2011
Hardcover: 342 pages

Juliette hasn’t touched anyone in exactly 264 days.

The last time she did, it was an accident, but The Reestablishment locked her up for murder. No one knows why Juliette’s touch is fatal. As long as she doesn’t hurt anyone else, no one really cares. The world is too busy crumbling to pieces to pay attention to a 17-year-old girl. Diseases are destroying the population, food is hard to find, birds don’t fly anymore, and the clouds are the wrong color.

The Reestablishment said their way was the only way to fix things, so they threw Juliette in a cell. Now so many people are dead that the survivors are whispering war– and The Reestablishment has changed its mind. Maybe Juliette is more than a tortured soul stuffed into a poisonous body. Maybe she’s exactly what they need right now.

Juliette has to make a choice: Be a weapon. Or be a warrior.

In this electrifying debut, Tahereh Mafi presents a world as riveting as The Hunger Games and a superhero story as thrilling as The X-Men. Full of pulse-pounding romance, intoxicating villainy, and high-stakes choices, Shatter Me is a fresh and original dystopian novel—with a paranormal twist—that will leave readers anxiously awaiting its sequel.

Stand alone or series: First in the Shatter Me trilogy.

How did we get this book: Review copies from the publisher at BEA

Why did we read this book: A novel that promised to be the child of Hunger Games and X-Men and which got raving reviews everywhere since BEA? Yes, please. How could we say no to that?


Ana’s Take:

Shatter Me is Tahereh Mafi ‘s debut, a dystopian YA novel, marketed as a mixture of Hunger Games and X-Men. Although I am not really a huge fan of dystopians (at least not of this recent YA batch, I haven’t been particularly lucky with my choices) , I am a huge fan of X-men and this connection was enough to make me pick it up. That and the raving reviews this book has garnered for the past few months all over the blogsphere, some of them by trusted reviewers.

It is the near future, the world has collapsed Juliette has been in solitary confinement at a mental asylum for 264 days. Her touch is lethal and a few years ago, she murdered someone by accident and she has been a prisoner ever since. Her keepers are The Reestablishment, the ones who are in control of this brave new world, in charge of saving humanity from the brink of starvation and death. The problem is: more than to lock her away for good, the Reestablishment might have other ideas on how to use Juliette as a weapon of torture.

Shatter Me is out tomorrow and I believe reactions to this book will be extremely polarised and the main reason for this will be the prose. Tahereh Mafi’s writing is very descriptive, relying a lot on metaphors and imagery and the strike-through tool. For some, this will be unique and beautiful. To others like me, it will come across as excessive and irritating. Words can be very powerful and I feel this was the idea behind the prose but there is a difference between power and force – the writing to me, proved to be forceful instead of potent.

At first, the use of strike-through and metaphors seem natural as a reflection of Juliette’s unstable state of mind and although the usage of strike-through words diminished as the story progressed ( as a clear result of the change in Juliette’s mental health), the metaphors kept going strong. The novel overflows with them. And in many cases, the metaphors didn’t even make sense. A few examples are in order:

I’m wearing dead cotton on my limbs and a blush of roses on my face

I catch the rose petals as they fall from my cheeks, as they float around the frame of my body, as they cover me in something that feels like the absence of courage

I blink and bottle my breaths

Not to mention a lot of exaggeration:

Hundreds of thousands of seconds pass and I can’t stop dying

(this is a quote from a mere conversation Juliette is having and not say, a quote from a fight scene or a torture scene)

I gasp so loud I’ve swallowed the entire room in one breath

and so on and so froth. I am sure Thea will have more examples.

The point is: I had a very strong, negative reaction to the writing and that definitely coloured my overall reaction to the book. But my problems with the novel went far beyond that. The story has definitely a good, strong premise especially when it came to Juliette. As a character on the brink of being driven insane by loneliness and starvation for human touch, she had a lot of potential. I do feel though this potential was wasted away by the need to constantly reaffirm Juliette”s goodness of heart. Her entire life she has allowed people to use her, to walk all over her and she has an undying love for human beings. I understand that part of it comes from her being insecure and lonely, but the hammering down of Juliette’s inner goodness is such that it goes beyond making her heroic and tips her over complete martyrdom. In terms of her powers, it is easy to see where the comparisons with X-Men stem from: she reminds me a lot of Rogue. However, in terms of characterisation, she is much more to the Rogue from the movies than the original Rogue from the comics. That is totally not a good thing, in case you were wondering as Movie-Rogue was a whinny, tearful thing whereas Comic-Rogue is complex and awesome.

Moving on to other elements of the novel, there are two more aspects to be discussed. First of all, the romance. The romance is a very strong element of the novel, at some points completely taking over from everything else. I won’t dwell: suffice it to say that he romance is not the insta-love I despise but is my second least favourite trope, the “I have always loved you even though I never spoke a word to you” trope, which is equally irritating because it also throws away any need for developing a love story. Just like the insta-love, the always-love is inexplicably there. Not to mention how this seems to be latest YA book in which protagonists have a difficult time getting around to simply kissing. Eventually Juliette and Adam do get hot and heavy but their first kiss takes forever to happen even though they touch foreheads, kiss necks, kiss cheeks, kiss ears but without managing to properly kiss because apparently the mouth is MILES AWAY FROM THE CHEEK/NECK/FOREHEAD. I have a tendency to find this hilarious. And that is most certainly not a good thing either.

Which brings me to my last point: the dystopian elements. It is a bit hard to believe that it has taken a mere three years for the Reestablishment to take over the entire world and rule it so completely. It is even harder to take these people seriously and fear them when one of their biggest leaders – in charge of an entire complex – is a 19 year-old psycho with delusions of grandeur and mommy issues. Warner is the villain of this piece and although he is the most interesting and complex character of the bunch, his excuse for wanting to use Juliette’s power as a weapon of torture is flimsy at best, because seriously what is the range of her power? One person at a time, and only if she is touching them. Seems like a bit short-sighted plan from someone who is supposedly extremely smart and ambitious.

Despite a competent, claustrophobic start and a promising ending, the aforementioned problematic aspects were far too strong for me to really enjoy this book at all.

Thea’s Take:

I was extremely excited to read Shatter Me, having listened to the charming Tahereh Mafi speak at Comic Con this year, and having read a number of stellar reviews for this debut, I was thrilled to finally dive into this highly anticipated book.

Unfortunately, I have to agree with Ana. I could not engage with the writing style of the book, riddled with nonsensical metaphors as it is, I could not find any foothold with main characters Juliette or Adam, and I could never buy the dystopia.

The most glaring, off-putting thing about this book is the writing style, and as Ana points out, the most egregious of these problems is that of the distracting metaphor. There are a number of nonsensical phrasings, such as:

My eyes break open. Two shattered windows filling my mouth with glass.


His lips soften into a smile that cracks apart my spine.


They filled our world with weapons aimed at our foreheads and smiled as they shot sixteen candles right through our future.


Warner thinks Adam is a cardboard cutout of vanilla regurgitations.

In these instances the metaphors actually make no sense, poetic phrasing intended or no. How would eyes breaking open fill one’s mouth with shattered glass? How can a smile crack a spine? What the hell does shooting sixteen candles mean (this sounds like a John Hughes horror parody)? What is a cardboard cutout of vanilla regurgitations? What do these phrases purport to accomplish? Other than stringing together random words in an attempt to sound poetic and deep, there is no actual meaning ascribed to these phrases, which is incredibly irritating. Beyond these examples, there are also the use of the strike-through – which, unfortunately, also doesn’t ever seem to attribute any actual meaning or added value to the text (besides gimmickry). I get what Ana’s saying that this is meant to be indicative of Juliette’s mental health, but I just don’t buy it. For example:

“What are you writing?” Cellmate speaks again.
These words are vomit.
This shaky pen is my esophagus.
This sheet of paper is my porcelain bowl.


He saved my notebook. Adam saved the only thing I own.

Why does that sentence need to be struck-through? Often in the narrative, Juliette’s words are repeated and struck through, only to have her say the exact same thing. Furthermore, as the book wears on, the strike-through technique fades almost completely from the story, leading me to believe even further in the gimmicky nature of the device. It’s a shame, too, because this is the kind of thing that I love – I love experimental formats that construe meaning with form as well as content (Mark Danielewski’s House of Leaves immediately comes to mind as an excellent example of this). Unfortunately, Shatter Me feels like the victim of its own excesses.

Beyond the problems of format, there’s also the blandness (or vanilla regurgitations?) of its main characters. Juliette is sickeningly saccharine, like Ana says, but as narrator, she’s also strikingly inauthentic. There’s a lot of telling in this book without showing (i.e. “Her lack of compassion as a parent devastated me and it reminded me too much of my own mother.“). This applies to the dystopian elements of the story too, as told through Juliette’s voice. We are given data-dumps in Juliette’s narrative about how the population was dying at an alarming rate before the Reestablishment took over and enforced their predictably totalitarian regime on the surviving vestiges of humanity. As far as dystopias go, this one is pretty standard with evil big government, dissenters thrown in jail, society militarized and homogenized, and so on and so forth. There’s no real emotion vested in this society, though, and the fact that a sadistic, cartoonish teenager is at the helm of the operation doesn’t help improve matters.

Ultimately, I gave up a little over halfway through the book because I was exasperated with the overwrought, trying-too-hard writing, the lackluster characters, and the inherent silliness of the society. While Shatter Me might appeal to others, it is not the book for me. This, unfortunately, is one of my few DNFs of the year.

Additional Thoughts: Don’t take our word for it. Check out Angie’s review at Angieville. And if you want to see for yourself, we are giving away a copy of the book. Go HERE to enter.


Ana: 4 – Bad

Thea: DNF

Reading next: Cold Kiss by Amy Garvey


  • Andrea
    November 14, 2011 at 2:06 am

    Are those quotes from the novel, or cryptic crossword clues?

    Though, I must admit, a couple of those worked for me. Highly poetic isn’t my usual taste, but the vanilla regurgitations gave me a wonderful image of a very mealy-mouthed coward.

    I’m still hanging out for a SF dystopia where the world sounds possible to me. I’m going to have to go back and re-read “Andra”, which is an ancient dystopia by Louise Lawrence and the last one I remember liking.

  • Amy @ Turn the Page
    November 14, 2011 at 2:49 am

    Thanks for the honest review – Ive been looking forward to this because before now, I’d only ever come across glowing reviews – but the sections you have quoted have made me pause, because even here they are irritating and annoying, let alone a whole book of them lol!

  • Megan
    November 14, 2011 at 4:19 am

    I have to say, those quotes actually kind of worked for me. I especially liked the breaking eyes/glass in the mouth one. They’re like metaphors taken one step further. If your eyes were actually made of glass and they broke, then yeah, you’d get glass in your mouth. I like the contrast of a soft smile and the violence of a cracked spine, or the image of bottled breaths.

    I think Ana hit it on the head when she said said people were going to love or hate this book. But I’d rather the bookshelves be full of polarising books than perfectly ok “safe” ones.

    I had no intention of picking this book up, but based off this review I think I will. This is why I don’t get why some authors get upset about negative reviews. If written well (like this one) they can bring in as many new readers as positive ones.

  • KB/KT Grant
    November 14, 2011 at 5:44 am

    The sixteen candles mention had me LOLing. I don’t know why, but I loved this book hard. As I mentioned in my review, Warner as a 19 year old being in charge of an army is unrealistic and a group takes over the US in 3 years? Not plausible IMO.

    Warner, the villains makes this a keeper for me. There’s just something about the character. I also found the ending too sweet.

    But I can see why you two would have issues with it. I think in part the writing goes against everything a writer is taught in order to pen a great novel. But then again it was so different, at least for me, from the blah de blah YA’s out there.

  • Amie McCracken
    November 14, 2011 at 6:27 am

    I was worried the hype for this book would bee too much. I’m sad to hear that it didn’t hit you guys well. But all the things you are saying are things I would be frustrated by so I am definitely hesitant now.

  • Sean Wills
    November 14, 2011 at 7:21 am

    What I’ve seen of this makes me think the prose style will be a major stumbling block for a lot of people – myself included. Phoebe reviewed it a while ago and summed up my impressions by saying that she was ‘never quite convinced that [Mafi] was in control of her prose’.

    To me, the sections you guys quoted read very much like somebody trying to run before they can walk. You need to really, really know what you’re doing before you can start using prose that abstract and metaphorical without it turning into a jumbled mess, and I’m not convinced that Mafi is at that stage yet.

    On the other hand, Shatter Me looks thankfully different from the legions of other dystopians coming out right now, so I might take a look if only for that.

  • Allison
    November 14, 2011 at 7:51 am

    I really appreciate your review, because I completely agree. So many people are raving about the book – I picked it up extremely excited and ended up totally put off within just a few pages. The book didn’t work for me at all – I enjoyed reading thoughts that parallel mine!

  • Serenity
    November 14, 2011 at 8:14 am

    The cracked spine one was my favorite – it actually made me laugh out loud. Too bad I’m not 13 years old anymore…otherwise these quotes would have been perfect for my AIM profile, alongside the other bits of Super Profound And Deep lyrics…

    Anyway, I think I will take your word on it this time and spare myself.

  • MarieC
    November 14, 2011 at 8:43 am

    As I was reading the review, all I could think of was that old Looney toons cartoon, ‘A Symphony in Slang’, where the the life story of a man is told at the Pearly gates (in Slang, of course), but St. Peter and Daniel webster kept picturing the story literally.

    Read the spine cracking quotation literally… with sound effects.

  • Gerd D.
    November 14, 2011 at 11:39 am

    Reminds of my experience reading Lustbader’s “Sunset Warrior” trilogy of books, the only thing that made me plough through them in the end was a feeling that somewhere between the superfluous prose was a good enough story hidden (I was wrong, but he wrote at least some fine fighting sequences).

    Meaning to say, it’s not too atypical, I fear, for debut authors to load their novels with this kind of needless symbolism. Probably trying to fake a sense of depth, when in fact, as Pierre de Boudeïlle put it:
    “Thy base is so trivial, so passing a thing,
    let us try to support it by words, and so prolong its image
    and its play.”

  • Karen
    November 14, 2011 at 12:11 pm

    Oof, sounds like the even more flowery sister of Delirium, which annoyed me SO MUCH. Thanks for the heads up, I’d seen a lot of glowing reviews but overwrought metaphors drive me up a wall. I will definitely pass on this one.

  • Rida (Raindrop Reflections)
    November 14, 2011 at 12:35 pm

    I think the first strike-out quote worked for me, even though, yeah, I couldn’t see why it had to be crossed out. Although I didn’t get most of the quotes up there, I’m REALLY hoping I end up liking this book nevertheless.

  • Ashleigh
    November 14, 2011 at 1:19 pm

    Great review! I liked it a little more than either of you did, but you took the words right out of my mouth on mostt points. Warner is definitely the best part of the book for me; villains of his general complexity and makeup win my attention. If only the other characters could have been so interesting…

    The prose was a big breaking point for me too. I liked it at some points, but most of the time, I thought it was the someone-call-Supernanny-this-kid-is-painting-on-the-carpet-and-punching-holes-through-the-walls sort of out of control. Possibly a little mean, but it’s the most accurate comparison I can make.

  • LiLi
    November 14, 2011 at 2:07 pm

    I agree about a lot of things in the review you guys wrote. I believe Warner could have such a great villain if he had more of a substantial “evil” background to play off of. I also agree that some of the metaphors contorted my facial expression into a question mark, and the strike-through was just plain annoying. I liked it when they were using it as a way to market the darkness of the book but it is taken for granted in the actual writing of the book.

  • helen
    November 14, 2011 at 2:38 pm

    Pub date is no correct-October 15 2010, should be October 15, 2011 I think. Although from these reviews I think I’ll skip it!

  • Heidi
    November 14, 2011 at 3:44 pm

    Actually, it should be November 15, 2011. =)

  • Stephanie @ Read in a Single Sitting
    November 14, 2011 at 6:48 pm

    Hmm, some of these worked for me, but some…not so much. I think I’d have to give this one a proper read to see if I got into the prose. One of my favourite books this year, Tantony, was filled with lush, bizarre prose, but it worked so perfectly–even though it perhaps shouldn’t have.

  • JenM
    November 14, 2011 at 7:20 pm

    Thanks for this review. I was very excited about this book, but I know that the prose and the metaphors would drive me insane. Just recently I was reading a contemporary romance that has gotten rave reviews from lots of well-known romance blogs, and all I could think was that the author never met a metaphor she didn’t like. It drove me crazy, to the point where I almost DNFed the book and I rarely do that.

  • Bookyurt
    November 14, 2011 at 10:19 pm

    Honestly I didn’t even make it past the first 20 pages of this one. I’m getting to the point where I want to avoid hyped dystopians because they seem to so often disappoint…

  • Ana
    November 15, 2011 at 2:26 am

    Hello everybody! Thanks for the comments. I am glad to hear that some of the examples actually worked for some of you – that’s exactly what I thought would happen. It is definitely a matter of taste – didn’t work for us, but can work for others, definitely.

    @ Heidi – thanks! we will update the date!

  • Etta
    November 18, 2011 at 6:39 am

    I had a lot of the same issues with this book that both of you did. I enjoyed the first 30 pages or so, since I felt the writing style actually worked well in the context of Juliette being locked up and going a bit crazy. But it all went downhill very quickly, and then the style began to grate on me. It was a major slog to get through the next 200 pages of Adam is so dreamy and Juliette is so good and Warner is so evil.

    I’m also really sick of dystopian novels where there’s so little thought given to the world-building and the broader implications.

  • Amanda
    May 7, 2012 at 5:08 am

    I have a weird complex about finishing a book once I start… I did and I want my time back. waaah! Awesome review! Did I say that I love your blog? 😀 Here’s my review

  • Amanda
    May 7, 2012 at 5:09 am

    I read this book. Didn’t like it. I was mislead by that awesome cover. 🙁 Here’s my review

  • Review: Shatter Me by Tahereh Mafi | All Things Urban Fantasy - Where Para is Normal
    November 2, 2012 at 2:37 pm

    […] The Book Smugglers – 4/10 […]

  • Review: Shatter Me (Shatter Me #1) by Tahereh Mafi | Lesley's Reading Heaven
    January 9, 2013 at 7:23 pm

    […] The Book Smugglers – 4/10 and DNF […]

  • VeganYANerds
    January 18, 2013 at 7:39 pm

    Your reviews are spot on with this book! I can see why some people gush about it, but it just did not work for me at all.

    Mands xox

    February 22, 2017 at 7:15 am

    thx for the review. liked it.

  • Alice @ Arctic Books
    July 20, 2017 at 10:01 pm

    Hi! I know this is a long shot, but if you still have that ARC of Shatter Me, would you be willing to trade? I’ve been a huge fan of Tahereh Mafi and I would love to add that ARC to my collection; I’ve been looking for that ARC forever! If you still have it, please let me know at my email arcticbookss(at)gmail.com or Twitter @arcticbookss. Thank you so much!!

  • McKenna
    January 20, 2021 at 8:51 pm

    I thought that this book had potential, if not over abused with metaphor slander. I found myself turning towards the antagonist, Warner towards the end. I resonated with Juliet at first, but she soon annoyed me a bit, by always complaining about her “power” – always pitying herself and whatnot. I found it oddly strange how many times she mentioned that Warner could touch her, but that she never told Adam. I did like how Juliet and Adam’s relationship wasn’t built on such a toxic foundation as so many YA books are reeling on, but I felt that the development of Adam and Juliet’s relationship was built on the whole “I always loved you” scheme, if that makes sense, which made me cringe. The ending was rushed., but I thought the story; the idea, was satisfactory. I think the author was trying to make the book more poetic like, but a lot of the figurative language fell flat on it’s face. Nonetheless, some of the word choice was still lyrical and promised a more hopeful text for this author in the future. If you can get past the over-dramatic metaphors, and the slashed out technique, I would say give it a try.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.